NATO countries are 31 countries and may reach 34 countries if the alliance was able to annex Ukraine with the rest of the annexation claimants, while the Warsaw Pact disintegrated and scattered after the fall of the Soviet Union, and with that scattering NATO was able to include many countries that were within the Warsaw Pact.
The two allies (NATO and Warsaw) historically had a major role in the Cold War between the two poles of the world (America and the Soviet Union) at the time of that period, and now NATO is getting bigger with the accession of large numbers, mostly European countries, and America retained the role of leader in mobilizing these huge numbers to fight Russia.
Why does NATO intervene in the war? It was established to defend its members, and Ukraine is not a member of the alliance, and the alliance’s intervention in the war is considered an intervention that has no legal basis unless its intervention is considered based on Ukraine’s request to help it, which is the door that allows the alliance to intervene out of fear for its countries if there are expansionist Russian intentions.
The ongoing war is almost a world war – even if it did not call it that – as America gathered all NATO countries to overthrow Russia, as if it is reliving the memory of the old goal of establishing NATO to overthrow the Soviet Union.
NATO’s intervention, led by America, strikes the hope of multipolarity if Russia loses this war.
The picture is fixed on the meeting of dozens of countries to fight one country, so will Russia move to restore the Warsaw Pact in any form, whether with the remaining old members who are steadfast in their support for it, or to win over countries with aspirations for a multipolar political space (such as China, India, North Korea and the rest of the countries that unipolar hegemony).
Time has passed since the Russian-Ukrainian war, and every day the pressure and intervention of NATO allies are increasing to change the course of the outcome of the war.
Will the recent intervention by providing Ukraine with cluster bombs by America be the wide scope for Russia to experiment with new, modern weapons, as it did in World War II by showing the weapon (Kolneshov), but this time in a new and destructive form? .
And if we assume that Russia will fight alone against all of these countries, isn’t this more appropriate for it to deviate from its reservation in the use of nuclear weapons?
Trapping the cat in a narrow corner enables it to jump randomly in order to (scratching) the one who is besieging it.
And the use of nuclear weapons will be answered with the same weapon, and this is the destruction that does not remain one pole or several poles.
It is strange – and it is not strange, in fact – that America is pushing NATO together to achieve its goal of remaining the only policeman in the world using the scorched arm (Ukraine) only in order to keep it in the leader’s platform, and this push confirms the absence of any sign of political intervention in the actual negotiations, not verbal or verbal. Formalities, NATO is still pushing the scorched arm (Ukraine) to continue a deadly war in which the victor will have destroyed a country and people.
